MAC · snapshot 2026-08-09

Macao SAR, China

Insufficient data

Overall risk score

Percentile of scored universe

Data coverage

60%

vs Australia (16.1)

No overall rating published for Macao SAR, China: only 3 of 7 weighted categories could be scored (minimum 5) and data coverage is 60%, below the 70% floor. The categories below show what the data does support.

Category breakdown

Political Stability & Governance

Low
18.9+6.1 vs AU

6 indicators · 100% coverage

Economic Resilience

High
42.4+31.4 vs AU

6 indicators · 85% coverage

Financial & Currency Risk

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data

Business Environment

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data

Security & Crime

Low
27.3+2.3 vs AU

3 indicators · 75% coverage

Climate & Social Compliance

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data

Technology & Digital

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data

Cultural Distance

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data · not in overall score

Key risks and considerations

Macao SAR, China does not meet the floors for an overall rating: only 3 of 7 weighted categories could be scored (minimum 5) and data coverage is 60%, below the 70% floor. Treat the category detail below as partial evidence, not a verdict.

The main risk drivers are no double-tax agreement with Australia, no investment-treaty protection with Australia and a boom-bust growth record (±32.4 pp over the decade).

Possible mitigations

  • Withholding tax. No double-tax agreement with Australia: model withholding tax on dividends, interest, and royalties into the business case — it can decide the entity-vs-export question.

Generated automatically from this snapshot’s indicator data — a starting point for analysis, not advice.

Indicators

IndicatorValueRisk scoreRating
Political Stability & Governance
Voice & accountability (WGI)58.046.1Medium
Government effectiveness (WGI)73.017.3Low
Regulatory quality (WGI)76.58.5Low
Rule of law (WGI)71.621.5Low
Control of corruption (WGI)59.528.7Medium
Political stability & absence of violence/terrorism (WGI PV)83.914.7Low
Economic Resilience
GDP growth (3-yr average, %)29.3% (3-yr avg)65.0High
Growth volatility (10-yr std dev, pp)±32.4 pp99.8Very High
Government net debt (% of GDP)0.010.0Low
Inflation (CPI %, vs income-group target)0.335.0Medium
Current account (3-yr average, % of GDP)25.0% (3-yr avg)40.0Medium
FX reserves (months of import cover)Insufficient data
GDP per capita (PPP, current intl $)$137,0311.8Low
Financial & Currency Risk
Capital-account openness (Chinn-Ito KAOPEN)Insufficient data
Currency stability (regime-aware classification)Pegged — credible (reserve-backed, low inflation gap)12.0Low
Sovereign credit risk (OECD country risk classification)Insufficient data
FATF listing (grey / black list status)Not listed0.0Low
Double-tax agreement with AustraliaNone in force100.0Very High
Business Environment
FDI regulatory restrictiveness (OECD FDIRRI)Insufficient data
Logistics performance (World Bank LPI)Insufficient data
Business readiness (World Bank B-READY pillar average)Insufficient data
Investment protection with Australia in force (BIT or FTA investment chapter)None in force100.0Very High
Security & Crime
Armed-conflict intensity (battle deaths per 100k, 5-yr)0.029.7Medium
Intentional homicide rate (per 100k)0.67.9Low
Organised crime pervasiveness (GI-TOC criminality score)Insufficient data
DFAT Smartraveller advisory levelLevel 2 — Exercise a high degree of caution40.0Medium
Climate & Social Compliance
Physical climate vulnerability (ND-GAIN vulnerability)Insufficient data
Disaster risk (INFORM Risk Index)Insufficient data
Modern-slavery prevalence (per 1,000)Insufficient data
Modern-slavery vulnerability scoreInsufficient data
Technology & Digital
E-government development (UN EGDI)Insufficient data
Internet users (% of population)89.829.8Medium
Cybercrime origination (World Cybercrime Index)Insufficient data
Secure internet servers (per million people)6586.631.4Medium

Per-indicator ratings are quartile bands of the 0–100 risk score. The Australia column shows the same indicator’s raw value for the Australian baseline in this snapshot.

Cultural distance

GLOBE 2004 societal practices · rated on distance from Australia · not in the overall score

The GLOBE 2004 study did not cover Macao SAR, China (~60 societies covered), so no cultural-distance profile is available.

Context — not scored

Unemployment

2.3%

Displayed, never scored: ambiguous for an entrant and unreliable where informal employment dominates. (2025, ILO modelled)

Trade agreement

No Australian FTA in force

Market access is decision-relevant but a benefit, not a risk — kept out of the rating.

Regional advisories

No higher regional advisory levels

DFAT Smartraveller sub-national advice where it exceeds the overall level.

Compare with

A score means little on its own. These economies scored closest to Macao SAR, China in this snapshot, which is the fastest way to see whether the rating is telling you something specific or something regional.

All 218 economies · How to read these ratings