NRU · snapshot 2026-08-09

Naoero

Insufficient data

Overall risk score

Percentile of scored universe

Data coverage

58%

vs Australia (16.1)

No overall rating published for Naoero: only 4 of 7 weighted categories could be scored (minimum 5) and data coverage is 58%, below the 70% floor. The categories below show what the data does support.

Category breakdown

Political Stability & Governance

Medium
32.3+19.5 vs AU

6 indicators · 100% coverage

Economic Resilience

Medium
35.7+24.6 vs AU

5 indicators · 65% coverage

Financial & Currency Risk

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data

Business Environment

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data

Security & Crime

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data

Climate & Social Compliance

Medium
41.7+31.3 vs AU

2 indicators · 65% coverage

Technology & Digital

High
48.9+35.1 vs AU

4 indicators · 100% coverage

Cultural Distance

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data · not in overall score

Key risks and considerations

Naoero does not meet the floors for an overall rating: only 4 of 7 weighted categories could be scored (minimum 5) and data coverage is 58%, below the 70% floor. Treat the category detail below as partial evidence, not a verdict.

The main risk drivers are no double-tax agreement with Australia, no investment-treaty protection with Australia, weak digital government and high physical climate vulnerability.

Possible mitigations

  • Withholding tax. No double-tax agreement with Australia: model withholding tax on dividends, interest, and royalties into the business case — it can decide the entity-vs-export question.
  • Connectivity constraints. Thin digital infrastructure: plan for offline-capable operations, local hosting or caching, and paper-tolerant processes with government counterparts.

Generated automatically from this snapshot’s indicator data — a starting point for analysis, not advice.

Indicators

IndicatorValueRisk scoreRating
Political Stability & Governance
Voice & accountability (WGI)67.329.5Medium
Government effectiveness (WGI)51.549.8Medium
Regulatory quality (WGI)46.667.6High
Rule of law (WGI)61.340.3Medium
Control of corruption (WGI)58.131.9Medium
Political stability & absence of violence/terrorism (WGI PV)84.812.8Low
Economic Resilience
GDP growth (3-yr average, %)1.0% (3-yr avg)50.0High
Growth volatility (10-yr std dev, pp)±4.3 pp65.6High
Government net debt (% of GDP)14.610.0Low
Inflation (CPI %, vs income-group target)Insufficient data
Current account (3-yr average, % of GDP)2.9% (3-yr avg)15.0Low
FX reserves (months of import cover)Insufficient data
GDP per capita (PPP, current intl $)$14,20062.6High
Financial & Currency Risk
Capital-account openness (Chinn-Ito KAOPEN)Insufficient data
Currency stability (regime-aware classification)No independent currency (USD/EUR/AUD in use)10.0Low
Sovereign credit risk (OECD country risk classification)Insufficient data
FATF listing (grey / black list status)Not listed0.0Low
Double-tax agreement with AustraliaNone in force100.0Very High
Business Environment
FDI regulatory restrictiveness (OECD FDIRRI)Insufficient data
Logistics performance (World Bank LPI)Insufficient data
Business readiness (World Bank B-READY pillar average)Insufficient data
Investment protection with Australia in force (BIT or FTA investment chapter)None in force100.0Very High
Security & Crime
Armed-conflict intensity (battle deaths per 100k, 5-yr)0.029.7Medium
Intentional homicide rate (per 100k)Insufficient data
Organised crime pervasiveness (GI-TOC criminality score)Insufficient data
DFAT Smartraveller advisory levelInsufficient data
Climate & Social Compliance
Physical climate vulnerability (ND-GAIN vulnerability)0.50272.9High
Disaster risk (INFORM Risk Index)2.214.9Low
Modern-slavery prevalence (per 1,000)Insufficient data
Modern-slavery vulnerability scoreInsufficient data
Technology & Digital
E-government development (UN EGDI)0.478.0Very High
Internet users (% of population)83.048.1Medium
Cybercrime origination (World Cybercrime Index)0.010.0Low
Secure internet servers (per million people)669.654.7High

Per-indicator ratings are quartile bands of the 0–100 risk score. The Australia column shows the same indicator’s raw value for the Australian baseline in this snapshot.

Cultural distance

GLOBE 2004 societal practices · rated on distance from Australia · not in the overall score

The GLOBE 2004 study did not cover Naoero (~60 societies covered), so no cultural-distance profile is available.

Context — not scored

Unemployment

Displayed, never scored: ambiguous for an entrant and unreliable where informal employment dominates.

Trade agreement

No Australian FTA in force

Market access is decision-relevant but a benefit, not a risk — kept out of the rating.

Regional advisories

No higher regional advisory levels

DFAT Smartraveller sub-national advice where it exceeds the overall level.

Compare with

A score means little on its own. These economies scored closest to Naoero in this snapshot, which is the fastest way to see whether the rating is telling you something specific or something regional.

All 218 economies · How to read these ratings