PNG · snapshot 2026-08-09

Papua New Guinea

Very High

Overall risk score

60.9

Percentile of scored universe

78th

Data coverage

89%

vs Australia (16.1)

+44.8

Category breakdown

Political Stability & Governance

High
73.7+60.9 vs AU

6 indicators · 100% coverage

Economic Resilience

Medium
33.9+22.8 vs AU

7 indicators · 100% coverage

Financial & Currency Risk

High
49.6+43.7 vs AU

5 indicators · 100% coverage

Business Environment

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data

Security & Crime

Very High
65.1+40.1 vs AU

3 indicators · 80% coverage

Climate & Social Compliance

Very High
88.7+78.3 vs AU

4 indicators · 100% coverage

Technology & Digital

Very High
68.6+54.9 vs AU

4 indicators · 100% coverage

Cultural Distance

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data · not in overall score

Key risks and considerations

Papua New Guinea rates Very High for market entry — an overall risk score of 60.9, riskier than 78% of rated economies and 45 points riskier than Australia.

The main risk drivers are low internet adoption (18.8% of the population), conditions that enable modern slavery, high natural-disaster risk, weak digital government and high modern-slavery prevalence (10.3 per 1,000).

Relative strengths: inflation, currency stability, GDP growth all rate Low, the least-risky rating band.

Possible mitigations

  • Political violence. Consider political-violence and political-risk insurance, keep asset footprints light, and maintain an exit/continuity plan with defined triggers.
  • Corruption and legal recourse. Run a strong anti-bribery program (Australian foreign-bribery law follows you abroad), conduct third-party due diligence, and seat dispute resolution offshore — arbitration clauses (e.g. SIAC or HKIAC) beat local courts.
  • Payment security. Elevated sovereign/transfer risk: prefer confirmed letters of credit or export credit insurance over open account terms, and watch for import-payment restrictions.
  • Banking friction. FATF-listed jurisdiction: expect enhanced due diligence, slower cross-border payments, and possible correspondent-banking gaps — keep KYC documentation impeccable and allow longer settlement times.
  • Modern slavery compliance. Elevated modern-slavery risk: apply enhanced supply-chain due diligence and document it — Australian Modern Slavery Act reporting will expect exactly this analysis.
  • Disaster resilience. High natural-hazard exposure: build business-continuity plans, check insurance availability (including parametric covers), and avoid single-point supply dependencies.

Generated automatically from this snapshot’s indicator data — a starting point for analysis, not advice.

Indicators

IndicatorValueRisk scoreRating
Political Stability & Governance
Voice & accountability (WGI)51.157.3High
Government effectiveness (WGI)33.884.6Very High
Regulatory quality (WGI)45.470.5High
Rule of law (WGI)47.165.9High
Control of corruption (WGI)31.775.1Very High
Political stability & absence of violence/terrorism (WGI PV)54.776.1Very High
Economic Resilience
GDP growth (3-yr average, %)4.4% (3-yr avg)15.0Low
Growth volatility (10-yr std dev, pp)±3.1 pp42.5Medium
Government net debt (% of GDP)52.160.0High
Inflation (CPI %, vs income-group target)4.410.0Low
Current account (3-yr average, % of GDP)13.0% (3-yr avg)40.0Medium
FX reserves (months of import cover)4.9 months30.0Medium
GDP per capita (PPP, current intl $)$5,21582.2Very High
Financial & Currency Risk
Capital-account openness (Chinn-Ito KAOPEN)0.3060.0High
Currency stability (regime-aware classification)Pegged — credible (reserve-backed, low inflation gap)12.0Low
Sovereign credit risk (OECD country risk classification)Category 6 / 782.0Very High
FATF listing (grey / black list status)Grey list45.0Medium
Double-tax agreement with AustraliaIn force0.0Low
Business Environment
FDI regulatory restrictiveness (OECD FDIRRI)Insufficient data
Logistics performance (World Bank LPI)2.759.1High
Business readiness (World Bank B-READY pillar average)Insufficient data
Investment protection with Australia in force (BIT or FTA investment chapter)In force0.0Low
Security & Crime
Armed-conflict intensity (battle deaths per 100k, 5-yr)0.785.5Very High
Intentional homicide rate (per 100k)9.3Insufficient data
Organised crime pervasiveness (GI-TOC criminality score)5.865.9High
DFAT Smartraveller advisory levelLevel 2 — Exercise a high degree of caution40.0Medium
Climate & Social Compliance
Physical climate vulnerability (ND-GAIN vulnerability)0.54986.6Very High
Disaster risk (INFORM Risk Index)6.589.8Very High
Modern-slavery prevalence (per 1,000)10.387.8Very High
Modern-slavery vulnerability score78.891.6Very High
Technology & Digital
E-government development (UN EGDI)0.388.3Very High
Internet users (% of population)18.895.4Very High
Cybercrime origination (World Cybercrime Index)0.010.0Low
Secure internet servers (per million people)88.178.8Very High

Per-indicator ratings are quartile bands of the 0–100 risk score. The Australia column shows the same indicator’s raw value for the Australian baseline in this snapshot.

Cultural distance

GLOBE 2004 societal practices · rated on distance from Australia · not in the overall score

The GLOBE 2004 study did not cover Papua New Guinea (~60 societies covered), so no cultural-distance profile is available.

Context — not scored

Unemployment

2.6%

Displayed, never scored: ambiguous for an entrant and unreliable where informal employment dominates. (2025, ILO modelled)

Trade agreement

No Australian FTA in force

Market access is decision-relevant but a benefit, not a risk — kept out of the rating.

Regional advisories

Higher levels apply in some areas (up to Level 3)

DFAT Smartraveller sub-national advice where it exceeds the overall level.

Compare with

A score means little on its own. These economies scored closest to Papua New Guinea in this snapshot, which is the fastest way to see whether the rating is telling you something specific or something regional.

All 218 economies · How to read these ratings