SEN · snapshot 2026-08-09

Senegal

High

Overall risk score

52.4

Percentile of scored universe

58th

Data coverage

83%

vs Australia (16.1)

+36.3

Category breakdown

Political Stability & Governance

High
53.1+40.3 vs AU

6 indicators · 100% coverage

Economic Resilience

Very High
50.4+39.3 vs AU

6 indicators · 85% coverage

Financial & Currency Risk

High
58.0+52.1 vs AU

5 indicators · 100% coverage

Business Environment

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data

Security & Crime

Medium
40.7+15.6 vs AU

3 indicators · 80% coverage

Climate & Social Compliance

High
60.3+50.0 vs AU

4 indicators · 100% coverage

Technology & Digital

Very High
63.5+49.8 vs AU

4 indicators · 100% coverage

Cultural Distance

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data · not in overall score

Key risks and considerations

Senegal rates High for market entry — an overall risk score of 52.4, riskier than 58% of rated economies and 36 points riskier than Australia.

The main risk drivers are no double-tax agreement with Australia, no investment-treaty protection with Australia, heavy public debt (net 130.2% of GDP), elevated sovereign credit risk (OECD Category 7 / 7) and external imbalance (current account -19.9% of GDP, 3-yr average).

Relative strengths: growth volatility sits in the least-risky quarter of rated economies, and currency stability and GDP growth both rate Low, the least-risky rating band.

Possible mitigations

  • Getting money out. Confirm profit-repatriation channels before committing capital: seek central-bank pre-approvals where required, consider an export-first model over an in-country entity, and structure via clear remittance jurisdictions.
  • Payment security. Elevated sovereign/transfer risk: prefer confirmed letters of credit or export credit insurance over open account terms, and watch for import-payment restrictions.
  • Withholding tax. No double-tax agreement with Australia: model withholding tax on dividends, interest, and royalties into the business case — it can decide the entity-vs-export question.
  • No treaty recourse. No investment-treaty protection with Australia: consider political-risk insurance for expropriation and transfer risk, since treaty arbitration won't be available.
  • Disaster resilience. High natural-hazard exposure: build business-continuity plans, check insurance availability (including parametric covers), and avoid single-point supply dependencies.
  • Payment fraud. Experts nominate this market as a cybercrime origin (World Cybercrime Index, 2021 survey): verify any change of bank details out-of-band, enforce MFA and dual authorisation on payments, and be sceptical of unsolicited counterparties.

Generated automatically from this snapshot’s indicator data — a starting point for analysis, not advice.

Indicators

IndicatorValueRisk scoreRating
Political Stability & Governance
Voice & accountability (WGI)57.148.5Medium
Government effectiveness (WGI)55.940.7Medium
Regulatory quality (WGI)51.156.8High
Rule of law (WGI)53.452.4High
Control of corruption (WGI)50.142.3Medium
Political stability & absence of violence/terrorism (WGI PV)62.060.1High
Economic Resilience
GDP growth (3-yr average, %)5.8% (3-yr avg)15.0Low
Growth volatility (10-yr std dev, pp)±1.8 pp12.3Low
Government net debt (% of GDP)130.295.0Very High
Inflation (CPI %, vs income-group target)1.535.0Medium
Current account (3-yr average, % of GDP)-19.9% (3-yr avg)85.0Very High
FX reserves (months of import cover)Insufficient data
GDP per capita (PPP, current intl $)$5,46381.7Very High
Financial & Currency Risk
Capital-account openness (Chinn-Ito KAOPEN)0.1678.0Very High
Currency stability (regime-aware classification)Pegged — credible (reserve-backed, low inflation gap)12.0Low
Sovereign credit risk (OECD country risk classification)Category 7 / 792.0Very High
FATF listing (grey / black list status)Not listed0.0Low
Double-tax agreement with AustraliaNone in force100.0Very High
Business Environment
FDI regulatory restrictiveness (OECD FDIRRI)Insufficient data
Logistics performance (World Bank LPI)2.3Insufficient data
Business readiness (World Bank B-READY pillar average)Insufficient data
Investment protection with Australia in force (BIT or FTA investment chapter)None in force100.0Very High
Security & Crime
Armed-conflict intensity (battle deaths per 100k, 5-yr)0.029.7Medium
Intentional homicide rate (per 100k)0.3Insufficient data
Organised crime pervasiveness (GI-TOC criminality score)5.254.4High
DFAT Smartraveller advisory levelLevel 2 — Exercise a high degree of caution40.0Medium
Climate & Social Compliance
Physical climate vulnerability (ND-GAIN vulnerability)0.52981.8Very High
Disaster risk (INFORM Risk Index)4.466.0High
Modern-slavery prevalence (per 1,000)2.919.7Low
Modern-slavery vulnerability score52.958.4High
Technology & Digital
E-government development (UN EGDI)0.569.7High
Internet users (% of population)60.174.5High
Cybercrime origination (World Cybercrime Index)0.330.0Medium
Secure internet servers (per million people)59.682.6Very High

Per-indicator ratings are quartile bands of the 0–100 risk score. The Australia column shows the same indicator’s raw value for the Australian baseline in this snapshot.

Cultural distance

GLOBE 2004 societal practices · rated on distance from Australia · not in the overall score

The GLOBE 2004 study did not cover Senegal (~60 societies covered), so no cultural-distance profile is available.

Context — not scored

Unemployment

2.7%

Displayed, never scored: ambiguous for an entrant and unreliable where informal employment dominates. (2025, ILO modelled)

Trade agreement

No Australian FTA in force

Market access is decision-relevant but a benefit, not a risk — kept out of the rating.

Regional advisories

Higher levels apply in some areas (up to Level 3)

DFAT Smartraveller sub-national advice where it exceeds the overall level.

Compare with

A score means little on its own. These economies scored closest to Senegal in this snapshot, which is the fastest way to see whether the rating is telling you something specific or something regional.

All 218 economies · How to read these ratings