GNQ · snapshot 2026-08-09
Equatorial Guinea
Very HighOverall risk score
63.6
Percentile of scored universe
83th
Data coverage
76%
vs Australia (16.1)
+47.5
Category breakdown
Political Stability & Governance
Very High6 indicators · 100% coverage
Economic Resilience
Very High5 indicators · 75% coverage
Financial & Currency Risk
High5 indicators · 100% coverage
Business Environment
Insufficient dataInsufficient data
Security & Crime
Insufficient dataInsufficient data
Climate & Social Compliance
High4 indicators · 100% coverage
Technology & Digital
Very High4 indicators · 100% coverage
Cultural Distance
Insufficient dataInsufficient data · not in overall score
Key risks and considerations
Equatorial Guinea rates Very High for market entry — an overall risk score of 63.6, riskier than 83% of rated economies and 48 points riskier than Australia.
The main risk drivers are no double-tax agreement with Australia, no investment-treaty protection with Australia, weak civic voice and accountability, pervasive corruption and a fragile rule of law.
Relative strengths: currency stability and government net debt both rate Low, the least-risky rating band.
Possible mitigations
- Corruption and legal recourse. Run a strong anti-bribery program (Australian foreign-bribery law follows you abroad), conduct third-party due diligence, and seat dispute resolution offshore — arbitration clauses (e.g. SIAC or HKIAC) beat local courts.
- Getting money out. Confirm profit-repatriation channels before committing capital: seek central-bank pre-approvals where required, consider an export-first model over an in-country entity, and structure via clear remittance jurisdictions.
- Payment security. Elevated sovereign/transfer risk: prefer confirmed letters of credit or export credit insurance over open account terms, and watch for import-payment restrictions.
- Withholding tax. No double-tax agreement with Australia: model withholding tax on dividends, interest, and royalties into the business case — it can decide the entity-vs-export question.
- No treaty recourse. No investment-treaty protection with Australia: consider political-risk insurance for expropriation and transfer risk, since treaty arbitration won't be available.
- Modern slavery compliance. Elevated modern-slavery risk: apply enhanced supply-chain due diligence and document it — Australian Modern Slavery Act reporting will expect exactly this analysis.
Generated automatically from this snapshot’s indicator data — a starting point for analysis, not advice.
Indicators
| Indicator | Value | Risk score | Rating | Australia | Data source year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Political Stability & Governance | ||||||
| Voice & accountability (WGI) | 26.6 | 95.4 | Very High | |||
| Government effectiveness (WGI) | 28.3 | 91.0 | Very High | |||
| Regulatory quality (WGI) | 32.8 | 92.4 | Very High | |||
| Rule of law (WGI) | 30.5 | 93.0 | Very High | |||
| Control of corruption (WGI) | 18.0 | 94.4 | Very High | |||
| Political stability & absence of violence/terrorism (WGI PV) | 63.5 | 56.8 | High | |||
| Economic Resilience | ||||||
| GDP growth (3-yr average, %) | -4.3% (3-yr avg) | 90.0 | Very High | |||
| Growth volatility (10-yr std dev, pp) | ±4.0 pp | 60.3 | High | |||
| Government net debt (% of GDP) | 26.1 | 15.0 | Low | |||
| Inflation (CPI %, vs income-group target) | 2.9 | 35.0 | Medium | |||
| Current account (3-yr average, % of GDP) | — | — | Insufficient data | |||
| FX reserves (months of import cover) | — | — | Insufficient data | |||
| GDP per capita (PPP, current intl $) | $16,133 | 59.5 | High | |||
| Financial & Currency Risk | ||||||
| Capital-account openness (Chinn-Ito KAOPEN) | 0.16 | 78.0 | Very High | |||
| Currency stability (regime-aware classification) | Pegged — credible (reserve-backed, low inflation gap) | 12.0 | Low | |||
| Sovereign credit risk (OECD country risk classification) | Category 7 / 7 | 92.0 | Very High | |||
| FATF listing (grey / black list status) | Not listed | 0.0 | Low | |||
| Double-tax agreement with Australia | None in force | 100.0 | Very High | |||
| Business Environment | ||||||
| FDI regulatory restrictiveness (OECD FDIRRI) | — | — | Insufficient data | |||
| Logistics performance (World Bank LPI) | 2.3 | — | Insufficient data | |||
| Business readiness (World Bank B-READY pillar average) | — | — | Insufficient data | |||
| Investment protection with Australia in force (BIT or FTA investment chapter) | None in force | 100.0 | Very High | |||
| Security & Crime | ||||||
| Armed-conflict intensity (battle deaths per 100k, 5-yr) | 0.0 | 29.7 | Medium | |||
| Intentional homicide rate (per 100k) | — | — | Insufficient data | |||
| Organised crime pervasiveness (GI-TOC criminality score) | 4.4 | 28.9 | Medium | |||
| DFAT Smartraveller advisory level | — | — | Insufficient data | |||
| Climate & Social Compliance | ||||||
| Physical climate vulnerability (ND-GAIN vulnerability) | 0.450 | 51.3 | High | |||
| Disaster risk (INFORM Risk Index) | 3.4 | 47.9 | Medium | |||
| Modern-slavery prevalence (per 1,000) | 7.8 | 75.9 | Very High | |||
| Modern-slavery vulnerability score | 68.9 | 86.6 | Very High | |||
| Technology & Digital | ||||||
| E-government development (UN EGDI) | 0.3 | 90.9 | Very High | |||
| Internet users (% of population) | 63.3 | 72.8 | High | |||
| Cybercrime origination (World Cybercrime Index) | 0.2 | 30.0 | Medium | |||
| Secure internet servers (per million people) | 66.6 | 81.6 | Very High | |||
Per-indicator ratings are quartile bands of the 0–100 risk score. The Australia column shows the same indicator’s raw value for the Australian baseline in this snapshot.
Cultural distance
GLOBE 2004 societal practices · rated on distance from Australia · not in the overall score
Context — not scored
Unemployment
8.3%
Displayed, never scored: ambiguous for an entrant and unreliable where informal employment dominates. (2025, ILO modelled)
Trade agreement
No Australian FTA in force
Market access is decision-relevant but a benefit, not a risk — kept out of the rating.
Regional advisories
No higher regional advisory levels
DFAT Smartraveller sub-national advice where it exceeds the overall level.
Compare with
A score means little on its own. These economies scored closest to Equatorial Guinea in this snapshot, which is the fastest way to see whether the rating is telling you something specific or something regional.
16.1 · Baseline for every comparison
63.5 · 0.1 points lower than Equatorial Guinea
63.3 · 0.3 points lower than Equatorial Guinea
65.0 · 1.3 points higher than Equatorial Guinea
62.2 · 1.4 points lower than Equatorial Guinea