GIN · snapshot 2026-08-09

Guinea

Very High

Overall risk score

63.3

Percentile of scored universe

82th

Data coverage

84%

vs Australia (16.1)

+47.2

Category breakdown

Political Stability & Governance

Very High
84.8+72.1 vs AU

6 indicators · 100% coverage

Economic Resilience

Medium
32.2+21.1 vs AU

7 indicators · 100% coverage

Financial & Currency Risk

Very High
79.4+73.5 vs AU

4 indicators · 73% coverage

Business Environment

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data

Security & Crime

High
51.1+26.0 vs AU

3 indicators · 80% coverage

Climate & Social Compliance

High
62.1+51.8 vs AU

4 indicators · 100% coverage

Technology & Digital

Very High
68.1+54.4 vs AU

4 indicators · 100% coverage

Cultural Distance

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data · not in overall score

Key risks and considerations

Guinea rates Very High for market entry — an overall risk score of 63.3, riskier than 82% of rated economies and 47 points riskier than Australia.

The main risk drivers are no double-tax agreement with Australia, no investment-treaty protection with Australia, thin secure internet infrastructure, a restricted capital account that complicates repatriating profits and elevated sovereign credit risk (OECD Category 7 / 7).

Relative strengths: inflation, GDP growth, current account all rate Low, the least-risky rating band.

Possible mitigations

  • Political violence. Consider political-violence and political-risk insurance, keep asset footprints light, and maintain an exit/continuity plan with defined triggers.
  • Corruption and legal recourse. Run a strong anti-bribery program (Australian foreign-bribery law follows you abroad), conduct third-party due diligence, and seat dispute resolution offshore — arbitration clauses (e.g. SIAC or HKIAC) beat local courts.
  • Getting money out. Confirm profit-repatriation channels before committing capital: seek central-bank pre-approvals where required, consider an export-first model over an in-country entity, and structure via clear remittance jurisdictions.
  • Payment security. Elevated sovereign/transfer risk: prefer confirmed letters of credit or export credit insurance over open account terms, and watch for import-payment restrictions.
  • Withholding tax. No double-tax agreement with Australia: model withholding tax on dividends, interest, and royalties into the business case — it can decide the entity-vs-export question.
  • No treaty recourse. No investment-treaty protection with Australia: consider political-risk insurance for expropriation and transfer risk, since treaty arbitration won't be available.

Generated automatically from this snapshot’s indicator data — a starting point for analysis, not advice.

Indicators

IndicatorValueRisk scoreRating
Political Stability & Governance
Voice & accountability (WGI)35.780.2Very High
Government effectiveness (WGI)34.183.2Very High
Regulatory quality (WGI)40.884.1Very High
Rule of law (WGI)37.283.3Very High
Control of corruption (WGI)24.186.2Very High
Political stability & absence of violence/terrorism (WGI PV)48.286.2Very High
Economic Resilience
GDP growth (3-yr average, %)6.1% (3-yr avg)15.0Low
Growth volatility (10-yr std dev, pp)±2.3 pp25.2Medium
Government net debt (% of GDP)48.135.0Medium
Inflation (CPI %, vs income-group target)3.510.0Low
Current account (3-yr average, % of GDP)7.9% (3-yr avg)15.0Low
FX reserves (months of import cover)1.3 months80.0Very High
GDP per capita (PPP, current intl $)$4,93583.2Very High
Financial & Currency Risk
Capital-account openness (Chinn-Ito KAOPEN)0.0092.0Very High
Currency stability (regime-aware classification)Insufficient data
Sovereign credit risk (OECD country risk classification)Category 7 / 792.0Very High
FATF listing (grey / black list status)Not listed0.0Low
Double-tax agreement with AustraliaNone in force100.0Very High
Business Environment
FDI regulatory restrictiveness (OECD FDIRRI)Insufficient data
Logistics performance (World Bank LPI)2.575.4Very High
Business readiness (World Bank B-READY pillar average)Insufficient data
Investment protection with Australia in force (BIT or FTA investment chapter)None in force100.0Very High
Security & Crime
Armed-conflict intensity (battle deaths per 100k, 5-yr)0.062.0High
Intentional homicide rate (per 100k)Insufficient data
Organised crime pervasiveness (GI-TOC criminality score)5.049.2Medium
DFAT Smartraveller advisory levelLevel 2 — Exercise a high degree of caution40.0Medium
Climate & Social Compliance
Physical climate vulnerability (ND-GAIN vulnerability)0.47461.3High
Disaster risk (INFORM Risk Index)4.973.3High
Modern-slavery prevalence (per 1,000)4.031.6Medium
Modern-slavery vulnerability score65.678.4Very High
Technology & Digital
E-government development (UN EGDI)0.482.6Very High
Internet users (% of population)33.387.9Very High
Cybercrime origination (World Cybercrime Index)0.010.0Low
Secure internet servers (per million people)12.394.2Very High

Per-indicator ratings are quartile bands of the 0–100 risk score. The Australia column shows the same indicator’s raw value for the Australian baseline in this snapshot.

Cultural distance

GLOBE 2004 societal practices · rated on distance from Australia · not in the overall score

The GLOBE 2004 study did not cover Guinea (~60 societies covered), so no cultural-distance profile is available.

Context — not scored

Unemployment

5.2%

Displayed, never scored: ambiguous for an entrant and unreliable where informal employment dominates. (2025, ILO modelled)

Trade agreement

No Australian FTA in force

Market access is decision-relevant but a benefit, not a risk — kept out of the rating.

Regional advisories

Higher levels apply in some areas (up to Level 4)

DFAT Smartraveller sub-national advice where it exceeds the overall level.

Compare with

A score means little on its own. These economies scored closest to Guinea in this snapshot, which is the fastest way to see whether the rating is telling you something specific or something regional.

All 218 economies · How to read these ratings