LAO · snapshot 2026-08-09

Lao PDR

High

Overall risk score

56.1

Percentile of scored universe

67th

Data coverage

93%

vs Australia (16.1)

+40.0

Category breakdown

Political Stability & Governance

High
58.4+45.6 vs AU

6 indicators · 100% coverage

Economic Resilience

High
42.2+31.1 vs AU

7 indicators · 100% coverage

Financial & Currency Risk

Very High
67.5+61.6 vs AU

5 indicators · 100% coverage

Business Environment

Very High
67.7+32.9 vs AU

3 indicators · 75% coverage

Security & Crime

High
48.5+23.4 vs AU

3 indicators · 80% coverage

Climate & Social Compliance

Medium
51.9+41.5 vs AU

4 indicators · 100% coverage

Technology & Digital

High
61.7+48.0 vs AU

4 indicators · 100% coverage

Cultural Distance

Insufficient data
no AU baseline

Insufficient data · not in overall score

Key risks and considerations

Lao PDR rates High for market entry — an overall risk score of 56.1, riskier than 67% of rated economies and 40 points riskier than Australia.

The main risk drivers are no double-tax agreement with Australia, elevated sovereign credit risk (OECD Category 7 / 7), weak civic voice and accountability, weak logistics performance and heavy public debt (net 80.6% of GDP).

Relative strengths: growth volatility sits in the least-risky quarter of rated economies, and GDP growth and current account both rate Low, the least-risky rating band.

Possible mitigations

  • Organised crime. Expect extortion, counterfeiting, and cargo-theft exposure: harden supply-chain security, vet logistics partners and distributors carefully, and avoid cash-heavy channels.
  • Corruption and legal recourse. Run a strong anti-bribery program (Australian foreign-bribery law follows you abroad), conduct third-party due diligence, and seat dispute resolution offshore — arbitration clauses (e.g. SIAC or HKIAC) beat local courts.
  • Getting money out. Confirm profit-repatriation channels before committing capital: seek central-bank pre-approvals where required, consider an export-first model over an in-country entity, and structure via clear remittance jurisdictions.
  • Payment security. Elevated sovereign/transfer risk: prefer confirmed letters of credit or export credit insurance over open account terms, and watch for import-payment restrictions.
  • Banking friction. FATF-listed jurisdiction: expect enhanced due diligence, slower cross-border payments, and possible correspondent-banking gaps — keep KYC documentation impeccable and allow longer settlement times.
  • Ownership rules. Check sectoral foreign-ownership caps and screening/approval requirements early — legal structuring may dictate the entry mode before commercial terms do.

Generated automatically from this snapshot’s indicator data — a starting point for analysis, not advice.

Indicators

IndicatorValueRisk scoreRating
Political Stability & Governance
Voice & accountability (WGI)31.188.5Very High
Government effectiveness (WGI)40.070.0High
Regulatory quality (WGI)44.872.4High
Rule of law (WGI)44.272.2High
Control of corruption (WGI)28.079.5Very High
Political stability & absence of violence/terrorism (WGI PV)75.433.6Medium
Economic Resilience
GDP growth (3-yr average, %)4.1% (3-yr avg)15.0Low
Growth volatility (10-yr std dev, pp)±2.1 pp19.5Low
Government net debt (% of GDP)80.680.0Very High
Inflation (CPI %, vs income-group target)7.740.0Medium
Current account (3-yr average, % of GDP)0.9% (3-yr avg)15.0Low
FX reserves (months of import cover)2.4 months55.0High
GDP per capita (PPP, current intl $)$10,38369.1High
Financial & Currency Risk
Capital-account openness (Chinn-Ito KAOPEN)0.1678.0Very High
Currency stability (regime-aware classification)Floating — normal volatility (8–13%)30.0Medium
Sovereign credit risk (OECD country risk classification)Category 7 / 792.0Very High
FATF listing (grey / black list status)Grey list45.0Medium
Double-tax agreement with AustraliaNone in force100.0Very High
Business Environment
FDI regulatory restrictiveness (OECD FDIRRI)0.4072.5High
Logistics performance (World Bank LPI)2.484.8Very High
Business readiness (World Bank B-READY pillar average)Insufficient data
Investment protection with Australia in force (BIT or FTA investment chapter)In force0.0Low
Security & Crime
Armed-conflict intensity (battle deaths per 100k, 5-yr)0.029.7Medium
Intentional homicide rate (per 100k)Insufficient data
Organised crime pervasiveness (GI-TOC criminality score)6.479.4Very High
DFAT Smartraveller advisory levelLevel 2 — Exercise a high degree of caution40.0Medium
Climate & Social Compliance
Physical climate vulnerability (ND-GAIN vulnerability)0.45252.9High
Disaster risk (INFORM Risk Index)3.652.4High
Modern-slavery prevalence (per 1,000)5.246.6Medium
Modern-slavery vulnerability score51.555.9High
Technology & Digital
E-government development (UN EGDI)0.478.5Very High
Internet users (% of population)65.670.7High
Cybercrime origination (World Cybercrime Index)0.530.0Medium
Secure internet servers (per million people)301.764.9High

Per-indicator ratings are quartile bands of the 0–100 risk score. The Australia column shows the same indicator’s raw value for the Australian baseline in this snapshot.

Cultural distance

GLOBE 2004 societal practices · rated on distance from Australia · not in the overall score

The GLOBE 2004 study did not cover Lao PDR (~60 societies covered), so no cultural-distance profile is available.

Context — not scored

Unemployment

1.2%

Displayed, never scored: ambiguous for an entrant and unreliable where informal employment dominates. (2025, ILO modelled)

Trade agreement

Free trade agreement with Australia in force

Market access is decision-relevant but a benefit, not a risk — kept out of the rating.

Regional advisories

Higher levels apply in some areas (up to Level 3)

DFAT Smartraveller sub-national advice where it exceeds the overall level.

Compare with

A score means little on its own. These economies scored closest to Lao PDR in this snapshot, which is the fastest way to see whether the rating is telling you something specific or something regional.

All 218 economies · How to read these ratings