LKA · snapshot 2026-08-09
Sri Lanka
HighOverall risk score
57.6
Percentile of scored universe
71th
Data coverage
93%
vs Australia (16.1)
+41.5
Category breakdown
Political Stability & Governance
High6 indicators · 100% coverage
Economic Resilience
Very High7 indicators · 100% coverage
Financial & Currency Risk
Very High5 indicators · 100% coverage
Business Environment
Insufficient dataInsufficient data
Security & Crime
Medium4 indicators · 100% coverage
Climate & Social Compliance
High4 indicators · 100% coverage
Technology & Digital
High4 indicators · 100% coverage
Cultural Distance
Insufficient dataInsufficient data · not in overall score
Key risks and considerations
Sri Lanka rates High for market entry — an overall risk score of 57.6, riskier than 71% of rated economies and 42 points riskier than Australia.
The main risk drivers are heavy public debt (net 100.8% of GDP), a restricted capital account that complicates repatriating profits, elevated sovereign credit risk (OECD Category 7 / 7), low internet adoption (54.6% of the population) and an unstable currency (floating — high volatility (20–35%)).
Relative strength: current account rates Low, the least-risky rating band.
Possible mitigations
- Getting money out. Confirm profit-repatriation channels before committing capital: seek central-bank pre-approvals where required, consider an export-first model over an in-country entity, and structure via clear remittance jurisdictions.
- Currency risk. Invoice in AUD or USD where the market allows, hedge unavoidable exposure, shorten receivable cycles, and build FX buffers into pricing.
- Payment security. Elevated sovereign/transfer risk: prefer confirmed letters of credit or export credit insurance over open account terms, and watch for import-payment restrictions.
- Price instability. Use indexation clauses, shorter pricing cycles, and local-cost pass-through mechanisms so inflation (or deflation) doesn't silently erode margins.
- Connectivity constraints. Thin digital infrastructure: plan for offline-capable operations, local hosting or caching, and paper-tolerant processes with government counterparts.
Generated automatically from this snapshot’s indicator data — a starting point for analysis, not advice.
Indicators
| Indicator | Value | Risk score | Rating | Australia | Data source year | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Political Stability & Governance | ||||||
| Voice & accountability (WGI) | 54.6 | 53.4 | High | |||
| Government effectiveness (WGI) | 46.0 | 61.7 | High | |||
| Regulatory quality (WGI) | 50.1 | 58.8 | High | |||
| Rule of law (WGI) | 52.5 | 55.3 | High | |||
| Control of corruption (WGI) | 40.1 | 60.1 | High | |||
| Political stability & absence of violence/terrorism (WGI PV) | 59.9 | 65.5 | High | |||
| Economic Resilience | ||||||
| GDP growth (3-yr average, %) | 2.6% (3-yr avg) | 45.0 | Medium | |||
| Growth volatility (10-yr std dev, pp) | ±4.7 pp | 70.9 | High | |||
| Government net debt (% of GDP) | 100.8 | 95.0 | Very High | |||
| Inflation (CPI %, vs income-group target) | -4.8 | 70.0 | High | |||
| Current account (3-yr average, % of GDP) | 0.3% (3-yr avg) | 15.0 | Low | |||
| FX reserves (months of import cover) | 2.9 months | 55.0 | High | |||
| GDP per capita (PPP, current intl $) | $17,065 | 57.5 | High | |||
| Financial & Currency Risk | ||||||
| Capital-account openness (Chinn-Ito KAOPEN) | 0.00 | 92.0 | Very High | |||
| Currency stability (regime-aware classification) | Floating — high volatility (20–35%) | 75.0 | Very High | |||
| Sovereign credit risk (OECD country risk classification) | Category 7 / 7 | 92.0 | Very High | |||
| FATF listing (grey / black list status) | Not listed | 0.0 | Low | |||
| Double-tax agreement with Australia | In force | 0.0 | Low | |||
| Business Environment | ||||||
| FDI regulatory restrictiveness (OECD FDIRRI) | — | — | Insufficient data | |||
| Logistics performance (World Bank LPI) | 2.8 | 53.6 | High | |||
| Business readiness (World Bank B-READY pillar average) | — | — | Insufficient data | |||
| Investment protection with Australia in force (BIT or FTA investment chapter) | In force | 0.0 | Low | |||
| Security & Crime | ||||||
| Armed-conflict intensity (battle deaths per 100k, 5-yr) | 0.0 | 29.7 | Medium | |||
| Intentional homicide rate (per 100k) | 3.3 | 58.3 | High | |||
| Organised crime pervasiveness (GI-TOC criminality score) | 5.0 | 45.6 | Medium | |||
| DFAT Smartraveller advisory level | Level 2 — Exercise a high degree of caution | 40.0 | Medium | |||
| Climate & Social Compliance | ||||||
| Physical climate vulnerability (ND-GAIN vulnerability) | 0.436 | 45.5 | Medium | |||
| Disaster risk (INFORM Risk Index) | 3.6 | 52.4 | High | |||
| Modern-slavery prevalence (per 1,000) | 6.5 | 57.8 | High | |||
| Modern-slavery vulnerability score | 55.7 | 64.1 | High | |||
| Technology & Digital | ||||||
| E-government development (UN EGDI) | 0.7 | 50.5 | High | |||
| Internet users (% of population) | 54.6 | 77.7 | Very High | |||
| Cybercrime origination (World Cybercrime Index) | 0.0 | 10.0 | Low | |||
| Secure internet servers (per million people) | 448.7 | 60.7 | High | |||
Per-indicator ratings are quartile bands of the 0–100 risk score. The Australia column shows the same indicator’s raw value for the Australian baseline in this snapshot.
Cultural distance
GLOBE 2004 societal practices · rated on distance from Australia · not in the overall score
Context — not scored
Unemployment
4.0%
Displayed, never scored: ambiguous for an entrant and unreliable where informal employment dominates. (2025, ILO modelled)
Trade agreement
No Australian FTA in force
Market access is decision-relevant but a benefit, not a risk — kept out of the rating.
Regional advisories
No higher regional advisory levels
DFAT Smartraveller sub-national advice where it exceeds the overall level.
Compare with
A score means little on its own. These economies scored closest to Sri Lanka in this snapshot, which is the fastest way to see whether the rating is telling you something specific or something regional.